Benjamin Rush Society

Single-Payer Health Care Systems, Multiple Health Care Disasters

Single-Payer Health Care Systems, Multiple Health Care Disasters

Piping Up
By Sally Pipes
June 7, 2011 


Democrats have recently seized on a novel way of reducing health care costs — threats.

The Obama Administration’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently announced that any insurance company that wants to increase premiums more than 10% will have to get approval from the government. Congress didn’t pass a law mandating this draconian policy — HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius simply decreed it.

Meanwhile, at the state level, Vermont Gov. Peter Shumlin just signed a bill that will create a public insurance option within his borders. Advocates hope that the end result will be a “single-payer” system, in which the state pays for the health care of its residents directly.

Both Sebelius and Shumlin declared that they were only trying to rein in health costs and limit wasteful spending on insurance company profits. But cost control by fiat — whether through rate regulation or a state-run health care system — will fail not only to restrain spending but also to improve Americans’ health.

Read more...

 

Lack of Evidence for Claim that Ryan's Medicare Reform Will Be Unpopular

Read more...

 

The Administration’s Argument For Obamacare Makes No Sense

The Administration’s Argument For Obamacare Makes No Sense

By Sally Pipes
5.30.11
Forbes.com

Next week, a three-judge panel from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals — two Clinton appointees and one nominated by President George H.W. Bush — will hear oral arguments in the multi-state lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare.

The administration will justify the law’s centerpiece — the individual mandate requiring all Americans to obtain health insurance — by pointing to the Constitution’s Commerce Clause, which grants Congress the power “to regulate Commerce . . . among the several States.”

But upon careful inspection, the Obama team’s argument for the constitutionality of the individual mandate amounts to little more than “because we said so.”

First of all, it’s hard to see how opting not to buy health insurance constitutes a commercial activity. Commerce has long been understood to be a transaction between two people or entities.

Read more...

 

Democratic-Leaning Poll: America Would Be ‘Worse Off’ Under Obamacare

 

Economic Destiny Comes Down To Obama Vs. Ryan

By Jeffrey H. Anderson 
May 19, 2011
Investors Business Daily

President Obama talks a lot about "winning the future." But to a large degree, America's future will be determined by the ongoing budget debate between him and House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, with the American people deciding the outcome.

The budget debate can sometimes seem a bit complex, but there are really two key numbers to remember: 18 and 24.  No matter when you start the clock — at the end of World War II, in 1970, or in 1990 — the average percentage of the gross domestic product that Americans have paid in taxes is 18%. And whether you look at the first or the last year of President Obama's 10-year budget, the percentage of GDP that he wants the government to spend is 24%.

Read more...

 

Is Mitt Romney Being Honest About His Healthcare Plan?

Piping Up
By Sally Pipes
5.25.2011
Forbes.com

When GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney announced that he would deliver a landmark speech on health care earlier this month, many expected — or perhaps hoped — that he would admit that the reform plan he implemented as governor of Massachusetts was a mistake.

Instead, Romney doubled down. “A lot of pundits around the nation are saying that I should just stand up and say that it was a mistake. . . But there’s only one problem with that: I wouldn’t be honest. I, in fact, did what I believe was right for the people of my state,” he said.

Romney also tried to insist that Massachusetts’ plan was somehow better than President Obama’s federal health care law. “Our plan was a state solution to a state problem. [Obama's] is a power grab by the federal government to put in place a one-size-fits-all solution across the nation,” he said.

Read more...

 

By 17 Percentage Points, Americans Support Repeal

 

A Devious Tax On Medical Devices

Piping Up
Sally C. Pipes
05.16.11
Forbes.com

 

 

This summer the IRS is set to finish writing the rules for one of ObamaCare's new taxes--its 2.3% levy on medical device companies.

Congress should wrest the pen from the taxman's hand and scrap the tax entirely. Not only will it raise the prices American patients pay for life-saving medical equipment, it will also destroy thousands of high-quality jobs across the country.

Set to go into effect in 2013, the tax is projected to generate $20 billion over the next decade. But that prospective revenue comes at an immense cost.

Read more...